Dirtiest Trials of the Twentieth Century  Who's Who Worldwide Registry Tragedy
Thomas FX Dunn appears determined to prove himself the worst lawyer in America

Who's Who Worldwide Registry and the Dirtiest Trials of the 20th Century

See for yourself         Politics In Federal Court        Love Your Federal Judge         Good Starting Point Victims? Not likely.             Membership of Managing Directors      The Breathtaking Debra Benjamin      Cross Springer       Asking for Guilt     Dirty Jury? Watstein - Big-time Con Man Goes To Court in A Limo Our Corporate & Institutional Leaders    Main Page       Con THESE People?!!            Commentary    Censored      Masters and Millionaires © EasyStreet, USA by MisterShortcut for the Path of Better Shortcuts and Path of Healthiest Living All rights reserved for those who reach out to starving people, okay? Here, you're invited to feed starving people with clicks - NO CHARGE! In loving memory of the beloved, effective Msgr Bernie Kellogg, rest in peace, and his most ardent student, known to many as MisterShortcut Hard to fully thank the unlimited generority of Mr. Paul Newman, who honorably earned hundreds of millions of dollars in his years... and used it all to feed people.   Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.     Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!      Remember 911day II.   Dirtiest Trials of the 20th Century - Miscarriages of Justice How rare it is to find a case that can offer not merely two or three, instead, more than a dozen major reasons for overturning that conviction. Here is a case studied by a respected federal judge for many months, who found that no crime had been committed, and dismissed the case. Reed Elsevier, Ltd, as the single richest and most powerful publisher in more than one hundred countries around the world, easily. empirically and truthfully described as one of the most corrupt corporations in all of human history, perverted the foundations of American justice in the Who's Who Worldwide case with cash, power, and perqs. Imagine a trial where not ten percent of the proceedings have ANY connection with most of the defendants. That alone should require a separation of trial. In this case, NOT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the proceedings, accusations, presented evidence, or accepted facts, had anything to do with the "sales" defendants. The Who's Who Worldwide case was all about Bruce Gordon, his machinations and his accountant, and the many companies operated in secrecy by Gordon and Liz Sauter, his true "henchman." For days and days and weeks and weeks, all the discussion was about Gordon and his actions. Prosecution witness after prosecution witness exculpated the sales defendants, yet, this same judge who had previously dismissed the case after months of study, was under one of the worst pressures any judge can be subjected to: pressure from the federal court of appeals above him, who, in New York's bailiwick, remains under the control of.... Reed Elsevier, the most powerful force today in the American arena of jurisprudence. This can be fixed by Presidential Pardon. Call 202-456-1414 to lift your voice.